AMNESTY - New Dustin Inman Society

‘AMNESTY’ IS ANY ACTION THAT RESULTS IN THE REMOVAL OF THE ILLEGAL STATUS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS.

DEFACTO AMENSTY IS ALSO THE REFUSAL OF ELECTED OFFICIALS TO ENFORCE LAWS AT THE FEDERAL AND STATE LEVEL DESIGNED TO DRIVE ILLEGAL ALIENS OUT OF THE NATION AND INDIVIDUAL STATES.

__________________________________________

From the New York Times, July 18, 1989:

1986 AMNESTY LAW SEEN AS FAILING TO SLOW ALIEN TIDE – Here.

__________________________________________

See also “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” and “immigration overhaul.”

___________________________________________________________

Center for Immigration Studies

A Bailout for Illegal Immigrants? Lessons from the Implementation of the 1986 IRCA Amnesty – Here.

On this page we will post a collection of items to educate those who may believe that a repeat of the “one-time” amnesty of 1986 will somehow solve the raging illegal immigration crisis in our nation. Legalization is not intended to stop illegal immigration or to secure American borders. Amnesty is intended to help the Democrat party with new voters and to make life easier for illegal employers. Amnesty only serves to encourage more illegal immigration.

__________________________________________________________

In Washington, there were efforts to pass another amnesty in 2005, 2006, 2007 and most recently in 2013. The Dustin Inman Society was heavily involved in stopping those legislative attempts at legalization of illegal aliens and illegal employers.

To get a basic education of that DIS has done, you can listen to a short interview with D.A. King on NPR’s ‘Morning Edition’ just after the pro-enforcement majority in America won the 2007 amnesty fight. Note: NPR abbreviated the print copy that accompanies the complete audio recording. We also note that because they cannot tolerate any dissent from their anti-enforcement narrative, since 2013 most of the media in Georgia has chosen to blacklist us in any debate on illegal immigration. We point to the Atlanta TV/radio news departments and cowardly, leftist media hosts depicted so well by “journalists” such as Bill Nigut at Georgia Public Broadcasting.

Essential knowledge

We have learned that it is necessary to constantly inform people that about half of the illegal aliens living and working illegally in the U.S. today dod not come over the border illegally. They came on legal, temporary visas and refused to leave when the visa expired. How many each year? It was 497,272 page V. according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security the Fiscal Year 2019 Entry/Exit Overstay Report -page V. Don’t be fooled when you hear a politician try to avoid much discussion of illegal immigration and solutions say “we must secure the border first…” We must secure the border and we must monitor and control temporary visa departures.

An invaluable resource for anyone who wants to have detailed insight into the 1986 amnesty is here from the Center for Immigration Studies.
We hope you will read a short 1989 news report from the New York Times on the early signs that the ’86 amnesty was not stopping illegal immigration.

Below is a photo of one of the eight billboards we were able to put up in the 2013 amnesty battle. We were only able to do it with donations from average Americans.

Here are photos of pro-enforcement rallies we staged in Washington D.C in 2005 and 2007 against amnesty-again. We invite you to see all of the photos and videos of our pro-enforcement rallies on the original DIS site.

—>UPDATE: The liberal AJC prints a lengthy correction after demand letter from the Dustin Inman Society. More news on this coming soon.

__________

Daily Signal News report (‘DEFAMATORY’: Conservative Demands Swing-State Newspaper Retract ‘Hate Group’ Smear’)
on the recent AJC attack here by the great Tyler O’Neil.

_______

I added educational hyperlinks to the below letter – dak.

_______

October 18, 2024

VIA U.S. REGULAR MAIL & E-MAIL

Leroy Chapman, Jr., Editor in Chief THE ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION 223 Perimeter Center Pkwy NE Atlanta, Georgia 30346

Re: Demand for Retraction and Apology

Dear Mr. Chapman, Jr.:

I write on behalf of my client, the Dustin Inman Society (DIS), to demand an immediate retraction and apology for the defamatory statements published in your October 7, 2024, article titled “Democrats in this Georgia district are backing a write-in candidate” by Tia Mitchell.

Through use of internet links, the AJC article wrongfully characterizes the Dustin Inman Society as a “Marietta-based anti-immigration hate group.” This characterization is false, defamatory, and published with actual malice. The Dustin Inman Society pushes for secure borders, is not “anti-immigration” and its proprietors do not hate anyone. Rather, DIS advocates for enforcement of U.S. immigration laws and actively opposes unlawful immigration. This distinction is crucial and well-known to staff at your publication.

I paste the offending paragraph from the AJC story:

“A search of activity under her birth name, Karen Sacandy, which Stamper legally changed in 2019, showed that she previously was aligned with a Marietta-based anti-immigration hate group. The group’s website often linked to Sacandy’s activities, like a letter seeking information about the state’s Immigration Enforcement Review Board and a copy of a letter to the editor supporting legislation to prevent immigrants claiming asylum from obtaining driver’s licenses.”

HEMMER WESSELS MCMURTRY PLLC
250 Grandview Drive, Suite 500, Ft. Mitchell, KY 41017 ● Phone 859.344.1188 ● Fax 859.578.3869

October 18, 2024 Page 2

We note the AJC informs readers that the Dustin Inman Society “often” linked to Karen Sacandy/Kate Stamper activities — but produces only two occasions.

Your story, for which DIS founder and president D.A. King was not contacted, informs readers that Sacandy/Stamper “was aligned” with the Dustin Inman Society. We note that polls show that a majority of Americans oppose the federal offense of illegal immigration. Since the letter posted on the DIS site was a published missive to the editor at the Cherokee Tribune, we must ask: does this make that newspaper a “Cherokee County-based anti-immigration hate group”?

Your characterization demonstrates a reckless and vindictive disregard for the truth, rising to the level of actual malice as defined in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. Actual malice in defamation law refers to publication of a statement with knowledge that it is false or with reckless disregard of whether it is false or not. Your repeated mischaracterization of the Dustin Inman Society, despite having been corrected on numerous occasions, clearly meets this standard.

The Dustin Inman Society’s position on immigration is clear and public:

1. It supports sustainable levels of legal immigration through established channels.

2. It opposes unlawful immigration due to various societal concerns, including: – Strain on public resources and services
– Potential and real public safety issues
– Economic impacts on low-wage American workers and America’s poor

– Challenges to the rule of law

3. The Dustin Inman Society defends legal immigrants when media attempt to blur the difference between them and illegal aliens.

Moreover, the Dustin Inman Society’s board includes lawful immigrants who have navigated the proper channels for authorized immigration. This fact alone should dispel any notion that the organization is “anti-immigration.” As he has informed you multiple times over much of the last two decades, D.A. King’s sister is a real, legal immigrant.

While we acknowledge that the Southern Poverty Law Center has designated the Dustin Inman Society as an “anti-immigrant hate group that denigrates all immigrants,” your article presents the “anti-immigration hate group” characterization as the Atlanta Journal Constitution’s independent assessment and statement of fact.

This smear is not only demonstrably false and ignores Mr. King’s many communications to you advising you of the truth, but also demonstrates an exceedingly unprofessional failure to fact-check and verify information before publication.

We demand that the Atlanta Journal Constitution:

October 18, 2024 Page 3

1. Immediately publicly retract the defaming statement in the October 7, 2024, article.

2. Publish a prominent apology, equal in visibility and placement to the original defamatory article.

3. Cease and desist from further defamatory characterizations of the Dustin Inman Society.

Failure to comply with these demands may result in further legal action. We expect your prompt attention to this matter and await your timely response.

Sincerely,

Todd V. McMurtry

cc: James Abely, Esq.