U.S. House passes largest immigration amnesty in history - battleground is now the Senate

The below is from our friends at NumbersUSA.com

House passes giant Build Back Better amnesty. Legislation now heads to the Senate.

FRI, NOV. 19^th

After several failed attempts, House Democrats finally completed the first step to passing what could be the largest illegal alien amnesty in U.S. history this morning by approving H.R. 5376, Pres. Biden’s Build Back Better legislation.

Click here to read all the details in the House version of H.R. 5376. In summary, the bill would:

Grant work permits and legal status, called “parole,” to an estimated 8 million illegal aliens
“Recapture” and issue an estimated 630,000 so-called “unused” green cards dating all the way back to 1992 above and beyond current annual numerical limits
“Recapture” and issue Visa Lottery green cards that went unused because of the COVID-19 pandemic
Allow hundreds of thousands of aliens with approved green card petitions to adjust their status above and beyond numerical limits

In addition to the mass amnesty, our Capitol Hill Team conservatively estimates that the bill would result in about 1 million additional green cards over the next 10 years.

Despite about a dozen moderates expressing concerns over the immigration provisions, among other things, the amnesty bill passed with support from all House Democrats except Rep. Jared Golden of Maine.

As expected, no House Republicans supported the legislation. Notably, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy forced Speaker Nancy Pelosi to delay the vote after delivering an 8-hour floor speech last night and into this morning, highlighting some of the immigration provisions.

WHAT NOW?

Senate leaders have signaled that they expect to make significant changes to the House-passed legislation, and if it passes, would require the House to vote on the Senate version.

Senate Democratic Leaders will also have to ensure that their version of the legislation complies with Senate rules since they’re using the budget reconciliation process to avoid a filibuster from Senate Republicans.

The Senate may not be able to take up the Build Back Better bill immediately since it faces a few deadlines following next week’s Thanksgiving recess. First, it must pass a spending bill by Dec. 3 to avoid a government shutdown. Second, it must consider raising the debt ceiling as soon as Dec. 15. But today’s House action will apply some pressure on the Senate to move forward on the budget reconciliation bill after tabling it for the last week or so.

We’ll be posting customized actions on your Action Board today, reflecting how your U.S. Representative voted on the Build Back Better amnesty bill. Please visit your Board to send these actions.

Finally, all of us at NumbersUSA wish you and your family a Happy Thanksgiving!

CHRIS CHMIELENSKI
NUMBERSUSA DEPUTY DIRECTORU.S. House passes

OCGA 20-3-66 – Determination of in-state resident status of students for tuition or fees

Plea for passage of legislation inaccurate

In an introduction to a recent guest column aimed at pending state higher education legislation on the AJC’S “Get Schooled” blog AJC columnist Maureen Downey leads readers to believe that refugees cannot access instate tuition in Georgia’s public colleges.

In the column (“Afghan women refugees like me want a future in Georgia”) writer Husnia Jamal, apparently a refugee, also laments “But I, like so many other displaced people living in Georgia, found out that I could not access in-state tuition here — no matter how long I live, work, or pay state taxes — because of my immigration status.” As she is migrating to Georgia from Afghanistan, Jamal could also be an ‘SIV’ (Special Visa Immigrant).

A quick look at the Board of Regents webpage on instate tuition eligibility illustrates the truth: ”…lawful permanent residents, refugees, asylees, or other eligible noncitizens may be extended the same consideration as citizens of the United States in determining whether they qualify for in-state classification.” This includes SIV recipients.

Correction requested.

D.A. KING

PRESIDENT, THE DUSTIN INMAN SOCIETY

MARIETTA, GA. 30066

Reply, soon after (thirteen minutes) I emailed my letter for consideration to be published:

Hello D.A.,

This is the passage in full from the reference you cite:

A non-citizen student shall not be classified as in-state for tuition purposes unless the student is legally in this state and there is evidence to warrant consideration of in-state classification as determined by the Board of Regents. Lawful permanent residents, refugees, asylees, or other eligible noncitizens as defined by federal Title IV regulations may be extended the same consideration as citizens of the United States in determining whether they qualify for in-state classification.

As you know from your advocacy, this has long been an issue with public colleges in Georgia. It’s affected straight-A students who arrived here as minors that I know of personally, and who could not pursue a college education in Georgia.

If nothing else, IMHO, the word “may” above (as opposed to say “shall”) leaves ample room for interpretation, good, bad or indifferent, as to who’s eligible for in-state tuition, especially when combined with how the “evidence” mentioned of above is assessed.

So, to my mind, no correction’s warranted to the Op-Ed.

Thanks for continuing to read the AJC.

All best,

Andre Jackson

Opinion Editor

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Andre.Jackson@ajc.com

” src=”blob:https://newdustininmansociety.org/467b2b6b-21d0-4ae0-8dc7-db6788fc58a6″ alt=”image001.png” width=”210.5″ border=”0″ class=”Apple-web-attachment Singleton” style=”width: 2.9305in; height: 0.4444in; opacity: 1;”>